PLANTS, THEIR PROPERTIES, YOUR BALANCE.
Botanical illustration: Stinging nettle — aerial parts (Urtica dioica L.)

BOTANICAL ILLUSTRATION · URTICACEAE

THE HERBARIUM · URTICACEAE

Stinging nettle — aerial parts

Urtica dioica L.

Stinging nettle is a perennial plant with stinging hairs. This profile covers only its aerial parts; uses of the root are separate.

The cited EMA monograph covers Urtica dioica and Urtica urens. These species have separate entries in the herbarium. The data apply jointly to the aerial parts and do not demonstrate superiority of either species.

Part used
Aerial parts
Origin & distribution
Europe to Siberia and western China, northwestern Africa.

Joint pain with swelling, redness or fever: seek medical advice. Do not use this profile to treat a urinary tract infection.

BOTANICAL IDENTITY

The right name is the first step.

Also known as: stinging nettle, stinging nettle, nettle

Do not substitute the root for the aerial parts. The term “white dead-nettle” does not refer to the species presented here.

An illustration is not enough to identify a plant for consumption. Do not forage for a species based solely on this profile.

01 · UNDERSTAND

Properties & uses.

Traditional use

Joint comfort

Traditional use of the relevant preparations for minor joint pain.

Read the source
Traditional use

Skin prone to seborrhea

Traditional oral use of the powder for seborrheic conditions; this is not evidence of the efficacy of a topical skincare preparation.

Read the source

The traditional uses described are not clinical proof of effectiveness. Evidence for one preparation cannot automatically be applied to another.

02 · UNDERSTAND THE ACTION

How does the plant act?

This profile covers the aerial parts of stinging nettle, not its root. The European monograph also covers Urtica urens and certain mixtures: its evaluation therefore does not systematically establish an isolated effect for each species. Urinary and joint uses are based mainly on tradition. A few human studies provide indications, often with combinations or without placebo. Nettle's rich chemical and mineral composition does not by itself demonstrate treatment of deficiencies or joint diseases.

Constituents to know.

Their presence and quantity depend on the plant part and preparation.

Flavonoids and mineral constituents
Flavonoids derived from quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin accompany the minerals in the aerial parts. Their presence in the plant does not directly indicate exposure after an infusion.Read the reference
Amines in the stinging hairs
Histamine, acetylcholine and serotonin are described in the hairs. Irritation on contact with the fresh plant does not demonstrate a therapeutic benefit.Read the reference
Traditional use

Traditional increase in urine output

The use aims to increase urine output as an adjunct for minor urinary complaints. It requires sufficient fluid intake and is unsuitable when fluid restriction is recommended. It is not a proven treatment for a urinary tract infection.

Read the reference
Traditional use

Minor joint pain

Certain preparations of the aerial parts are traditionally used for minor joint pain in adults. This demonstrates neither cartilage repair nor an effect on the progression of rheumatoid arthritis.

Read the reference
Traditional use

Seborrheic skin: a specific form

The monograph also mentions traditional oral use of the powder for seborrheic skin conditions. This mention does not validate every lotion recipe or establish a treatment for seborrheic dermatitis.

Read the reference
Preclinical research

Experimental diuresis: results depend on the route

Animal studies sometimes show increased urine output, whereas some oral experiments do not find this effect. Effects after injection or infusion cannot predict those of a herbal tea.

Read the reference

What this means for preparation.

The word “nettle” is insufficient: check the species, part and form. Root data do not transfer to the leaves. Fluid restriction, blood in the urine or a red, swollen joint change the situation and call for professional advice.

03 · EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE

What the research shows.

A laboratory or animal result alone does not demonstrate a benefit in humans. Each result must be read alongside the preparation studied and its limitations.

01Human studies

Acute arthritis: small trial with diclofenac

Type of research
An open-label randomised pilot trial published in 1997, involving 40 participants, of whom 37 completed the study.
Preparation concerned
Cooked Urtica dioica herb combined with a lower amount of diclofenac; comparison with a higher amount of diclofenac alone.
Observed results
Both groups showed improvements in their symptom scores. The authors proposed further study of a possible complementary effect.
Limitations to consider
The lack of blinding, small sample size and different treatments prevent isolation of nettle's effect. This trial does not justify independently reducing an anti-inflammatory drug or replacing it with a plant.
Read the reference
02Human studies

Combination studied in knee osteoarthritis

Type of research
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial over 12 weeks.
Preparation concerned
A formula combining rosehip, Urtica dioica leaf extract, devil's claw and vitamin D.
Observed results
The formula improved symptom scores compared with placebo.
Limitations to consider
Several components were administered together: the result cannot be attributed to nettle alone, or to juice or an infusion of its aerial parts. Conflicts of interest are declared in the publication.
Read the reference
03Insufficient evidence

Nettle juice: observational data

Type of research
Open-label study of 114 people over 12 weeks, assessed by EMA.
Preparation concerned
Juice from fresh aerial parts of Urtica dioica and/or Urtica urens.
Observed results
Urinary or joint improvements were reported.
Limitations to consider
Without a control group or validated scales, these observations do not constitute sufficient evidence.
Read the reference

Documentary review dated 09/10/2026. The references remain available to check the context.

04 · CHOOSE A PREPARATION

One plant, several preparations.

Only forms documented in this profile’s sources are presented.

InfusionAerial parts · Route: oral

A form documented for minor joint pain in adults.

Please note: Not equivalent to the root.

Read the source
PowderAerial parts · Route: oral

Form covered by traditional use for seborrheic skin.

Please note: Follow the preparation and dose specified in the package leaflet.

Read the source
Extracts and juiceAerial parts · Route: oral

Some oral preparations are documented for joint comfort.

Please note: Variable concentrations; forms containing alcohol are possible.

Read the source

05 · BEFORE ANY USE

Precautions & contraindications.

This guidance does not cover every individual situation. Missing information is not a guarantee of safety.

Contraindications

  • Allergy to nettle.
  • For urinary use: not recommended if fluid restriction has been prescribed.

Medicine interactions

  • No interactions reported in the monograph; this does not guarantee compatibility with all treatments.

Adverse effects

  • Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea; itching, rash or hives. Frequencies unknown.

Pregnancy & breastfeeding

Pregnancy and breastfeeding: medicinal use is not recommended because of insufficient data. Safety has not been established.

Children & adolescents

Joint use: not recommended under 18 years of age. Seborrheic use: not recommended under 12 years of age.

If symptoms persist, worsen or are unusual, consult a healthcare professional. In an emergency, contact the emergency services.

06 · PUTTING KNOWLEDGE INTO PRACTICE

Preparations & recipes.

No home recipe is provided in this profile. For an appropriate preparation, refer to the product leaflet and ask your pharmacist for advice.

07 · CHECK THE SOURCES

Sources for this profile.

  1. EMA — Urtica dioica L. / Urtica urens L.: summary and documentsAccessed on 08/10/2026
  2. EMA — monograph on Urtica dioica L. / Urtica urens L.Accessed on 08/10/2026
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew — botanical identityAccessed on 08/10/2026
  4. EMA — Assessment report on Urtica dioica L.; Urtica urens L., herba, Revision 1Accessed on 09/10/2026
  5. Chrubasik et al. (1997) — Evidence for antirheumatic effectiveness of Herba Urticae dioicae in acute arthritis: A pilot studyAccessed on 09/10/2026
  6. Moré et al. (2017) — A Rosa canina - Urtica dioica - Harpagophytum procumbens/zeyheri Combination Significantly Reduces Gonarthritis Symptoms in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind StudyAccessed on 09/10/2026

Illustration: Otto Wilhelm Thomé, Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (1885) · Public domain (Public Domain Mark 1.0). View the original image and its licence. Image resized and converted to WebP.

A TOUCH OF SOLÉA

Myriam’s tip

Myriam is reviewing the tip for this profile.

Myriam

CONTINUE EXPLORING

More pages to explore.

The full herbarium
Rosaceae

Agrimonia eupatoria L.

Agrimony

DigestionMouth & throat

Traditional oral use; seek medical advice if it persists for more than three days.

Traditional use

Blood in the stool, dehydration or worsening symptoms: seek medical advice.

Discover the plant
Asteraceae

Calendula officinalis L.

Calendula — pot marigold

Skin

Traditional use for minor skin inflammation and to support the healing of small wounds.

Traditional use

Allergies are possible. Seek medical advice for signs of infection, worsening or persistence beyond one week.

Discover the plant
Asteraceae

Matricaria recutita L.

German chamomile

DigestionSkin

Traditional use for bloating and minor digestive spasms; insufficient clinical evidence to conclude that efficacy has been demonstrated.

Traditional use

Allergies to Asteraceae; precautions differ by form. Seek medical advice if symptoms last more than a week.

Discover the plant
WhatsApp Appointments